[ad_1]
It is a easy, low-tech tweak. Nevertheless it makes all of the distinction. Alienware has a second 34-inch ultrawide OLED gaming monitor out within the Alienware 34 AW3423DWF and, hallelujah, it has a shiny anti-glare coating rather than the OG mannequin’s matte coating. Maintain that thought, we’ll come again to the shiny goodness in a second.
Hallelujah, it has a shiny anti-glare coating.
When Alienware wheeled out what was the world’s first OLED gaming monitor, the Alienware 34 AW3423DW, it went straight to the highest of the desk. It was merely gorgeous.
Nevertheless it wasn’t, you already know, really good. Now there’s one other 34-inch ultrawide Alienware OLED monitor that appears almost an identical however prices a number of hundred {dollars} much less. So what, precisely, is happening?
The brand new Alienware 34 AW3423DWF provides an “F” on the top and loses a couple of on-paper options within the quest for that lower cost level. For starters, the principally pointless Nvidia G-Sync Final certification and the expensive G-Sync chip it requires have been ditched.
Alienware 34 AW3423DWF specs
Display screen dimension: 34-inch
Decision: 3440 x 1440
Brightness: 1,000 nits peak HDR 3% APL, 250 nits full display screen SDR
Response time: 0.1ms
Refresh charge: 165Hz
Viewing angle: 178° H&V
Distinction ratio: 1M:1
Options: OLED panel, 99.3% DCI-P3, adaptive sync, 2x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x HDMI 2.1, USB hub, 1800R curve
Value: $1,099 | £929
As a substitute you get AMD’s Freesync Premium Professional and due to this fact completely enough adaptive refresh help. Talking of refresh charges, this new F mannequin steps down from 175Hz to 165Hz. You are by no means going to really feel that distinction in-game and it looks like the form of minor spec tweak designed for product differentiation. You realize, to assist Alienware justify the value of the costlier mannequin: it is 10Hz sooner!
No matter, these particulars apart you are principally getting the identical 34-inch ultrawide and barely curved proposition as earlier than. The Samsung QD-OLED panel is carried over, which is an excellent factor.
Not solely do you get the silly-fast pixel response that is attribute of contemporary OLED tech. Samsung’s tackle OLED delivers far more constant brightness efficiency than LG’s competing OLED panels, as seen in LG’s personal OLED gaming displays and fashions just like the Corsair Xeneon Flex.
So, you do not have to cope with distractions like the entire display screen dimming dramatically in response to rendering a big vivid object, when, say, you open your net browser over a darkk desktop wallpaper and the OLED brightness limiter kicks in. Yuck.
This Alienware does have a brightness limiter, but it surely’s far much less aggressive than on most LG-equipped displays and also you barely discover it taking place. Extra to the purpose, this monitor all the time appears to be like punchy, which you completely can’t say of displays with LG OLED tech.
The truth is, it is higher than that as a result of the shiny actually lets the OLED panel sing. In that regard, it is similar to the Philips Evnia 34M2C8600, which is one other member of the Samsung QD-OLED gang and in addition has a shiny anti-glare coating. It does wonders for black ranges and distinction. Together with the Philips, that is merely one of the best HDR gaming expertise you’ll be able to at the moment get.
By the way, the coating could be very effectively judged. It is not over reflective and distracting in that regard. It simply ups the distinction and removes that slight greying of darker tones that comes with a matte coating.
Anyway, there are LCD displays with mini-LED backlights that can go brighter, particularly full-screen or near-full-screen. However they lack the per-pixel lighting precision of OLED. Oh, and the velocity. Lordy, this factor is fast, there’s simply no movement blur, not from the pixels.
That is merely one of the best HDR gaming expertise you’ll be able to at the moment get.
After all, at 165Hz there are sooner shows in refresh phrases. However for many avid gamers more often than not, 165Hz is lots. Anyway, other than the adjustments and tweaks mentioned, most of what utilized to the unique Alienware 4 AW3423DW additionally applies right here. It is simply this monitor is cheaper, which makes it a straightforward choose.
It is also cheaper than the Philips Evnia and in comparison with that monitor is barely lacking a USB Sort-C connection, which in a gaming context is not an enormous loss. Present USB Sort-C energy supply is restricted to 100W, which is not sufficient to maintain a gaming laptop computer juiced.
As for reservations, effectively, as soon as once more it is the identical story because the OG Alienware OLED. For basic computing the pixel density ain’t nice. That does not make for extraordinarily crisp fonts in Home windows or tremendous sharp picture element. The triangular somewhat than vertically striped RGB subpixel substructure would not assist with textual content readability, both.
Then there’s the entire OLED burn-in factor. There’s some early proof that Samsung’s QD-OLED tech could also be barely extra prone to picture retention than the LG various. Nevertheless it’s not definitive. No matter, you get a three-year guarantee with burn-in cowl, so the easy reply is do not buy if you cannot settle for any burn-in after that point interval, since you will not be coated.
And naturally, that is nonetheless a really costly monitor, even on the relative low cost. However you’ll be able to nonetheless ink the brand new Alienware 34 AW3423DWF in as our new favorite gaming panel. As a result of it is completely farking fabulous.
[ad_2]
Source link