[ad_1]
One other day, one other large online game crossover. This time it’s Bungie’s on-line looter shooter, Future 2, including Witcher 3-inspired armor to its digital retailer. Are you excited? I’m not. In actuality, I’m simply actually bored with each model mixing collectively, no matter whether or not it is smart or is required, as if concocting the world’s worst stew.
On Tuesday, Bungie revealed some new Witcher-inspired skins at a time when the sport is at present struggling, and the builders are nonetheless recovering from painful layoffs. It’s dangerous timing to drop such content material, however who cares about that? What actually issues is making extra money, which is your entire level behind crossover skins like this.
Look, I’m no naive idiot. I perceive that all the video games, films, books, and TV reveals we take pleasure in are created largely so firms can make cash. I get it. However even most corporate-backed artwork and leisure is made by not less than a couple of people who find themselves attempting (and never all the time succeeding) to inform tales or share one thing of price with others.
However crossover skins—like that point Resident Evil characters popped up in Monster Hunter, or when “Scarface” turned playable in PayDay 2—aren’t created for every other purpose however to merge two widespread issues and make some cash. It’s uncooked capitalism and pandering offered with no filter or excuse. It’s merely a writer or developer saying, “We took that factor you appreciated from no matter and crammed its carcass into this different factor you appear to love. Give us…uh, I don’t know…let’s say $20!” These crossover skins remind me of an outdated Tumblr that cataloged all of the horrible “mash-ups” that existed on-line that have been merely two manufacturers mashed into one merchandise within the hopes of constructing a joke or promoting a shirt.
And as somebody who’s a really boring individual in the case of lore and online game universes, it’s additionally annoying to see increasingly more video games ruining their independently crafted worlds simply so G.I. Joe troopers or a personality from 5 Nights at Freddy’s could be flipped into money for a restricted time. I’m bored with this pattern not solely rising, however turning into normalized.
Am I a stick within the mud as a result of I would like my fictional franchises to be separate from one another outdoors of very particular and uncommon events? Possibly, however I don’t care! I’m high-quality dying on this hill.
I do know there can be some individuals who clarify that I don’t have to purchase the skins. That I can ignore them. However in video games like Future or Rainbow Six Siege, these skins are shoved in my face with no choice to show them off. I assume the explanation this feature doesn’t exist is out of worry. Publishers are most likely involved about all the cash that might be misplaced if folks realized “Wait, of us won’t see my Rick and Morty outfit?! No sale!” (Shout out to Halo: The Grasp Chief Collection for including a “Conceal New Skins” choice to protect the traditional expertise!)
In the end, I really feel like an outdated man yelling on the ever-shifting clouds. Publishers are making report quantities of cash off promoting costly beauty objects. So why on this planet would they cease including crossover skins to each online game individuals are nonetheless enjoying in 2023?
I suppose I’ll simply should provide you with some headcanon purpose why Halo characters are hanging out with Rainbow Six Siege operators. Possibly, uh, the Grasp Chief outfit is a Halloween costume that the operator’s commander allowed him to put on throughout missions. Certain. No matter.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
