Reddit – Dive into something

There isn’t a ethical superiority both approach.

I imply, I do not say this to sound smug however I believe I would definitely really feel morally superior for opting to not play it if I discovered it was aiding the Russians of their conflict to any capability.

You possibly can’t separate artwork from artist on this vogue when hurt is actively being achieved, and is aided by consumption. You do this when the artist is useless within the floor and that consumption is not hurting others. Something much less is to separate the buyer from emotions of guilt as a result of they worth their very own leisure greater than any hurt generated.

Edit: For many who are utilizing whataboutism and utilizing this idea in broader scopes, you are 100% appropriate, but it surely’s not some type of ‘gotcha’.

The place it differs although is that that is for purely leisure functions and never a operate of survival, this doesn’t fall below “There isn’t a such factor as moral consumption below capitalism”.

That being mentioned, EVERYONE makes these types of issues of non-public want or need versus the moral affect of that consumption, whether or not you are conscious of it or not. The query is although, the place do you personally draw that line?

This concept is not equal amongst types of consumption, nonetheless, because the measured injury will probably be totally different from occasion to occasion. That means, that sure, one motion may very well be thought of extra morally reprehensible than one other.

That final bit is not an argument of the extent of morality of this specific dialogue, however of the idea as a complete.